Anti-Bullying and Undermining Campaign


Understanding Oppressive Behaviours

The 2021 NHS Staff Survey for England reported that almost 19% all NHS staff experienced at least one incident harassment, bullying or abuse from their colleagues over the last 12 months.[1] Not only does this have a devastating impact on individuals and the teams within which they work, but it also has serious consequences for patient care. It is also contrary to the professional behaviours outlined in the General Medical Council's Good Medical Practice[2] guidance and the Nursing and Midwifery Council Code of Practice[3].

Bullying, undermining and abuse also drains limited NHS resources, and is estimated to cost the NHS in England at least £2.3bn[4] a year in sickness absence, employee turnover, productivity and employment relations. Moreover, studies in the US have attributed disruptive behaviour in the perioperative area alone to 67% of adverse events, 71% of medical errors, and 27% of perioperative deaths.[5]

The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh is committed to eradicating bullying and undermining from the surgical and dental professions. We continue to:

  • Have a zero tolerance approach to bullying, undermining, producing a series of Professional Standards
  • Provide free access to our anti-bullying toolkit, learning e-module and other supporting materials offered by partner organisations.
  • Work with partners from across healthcare professions to host events, offer advice and other initiatives, such as the anti-bullying Alliance, aimed at developing practical solutions to address bullying in the medical workplace.
  • Lead the debate on this issue in the press and on social media.
  • Develop key performance indicators to determine the effectiveness of interventions and collaborations targeting bullying and undermining. 

In any given year, around a fifth of all NHS staff report that they have been subject to at least one incidence of bullying, undermining and harassment from their colleagues. Bullying affects all parts of the medical and nursing profession with serious consequences not only for those on the receiving end but for the working environment more generally. Even worse, bullying and undermining have a proven detrimental impact on patient outcomes, taking much needed resources and attention away from patient care.

The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh has a zero-tolerance approach to bullying, undermining and harassment. We are committed to using our core educational, assessment and audit activities to improve workplace behaviour and culture as well as use our influence to promote systemic change, working where we can in partnership with other organisations who are similarly committed to implementing long term change.

Protecting Yourself, Protecting Your Colleagues 

 

Resources to Help Change the Culture

Negotiation


This campaign is endorsed by:

                          

Bullying harms your profession and your patients. Let’s Remove It.

If you have any enquiries about any aspect of RCSEd’s anti-bullying work, please contact

Chris Sanderson
Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
85-89 Colmore Row
Birmingham
B3 2BB

Email: birmingham@rcsed.ac.uk


Reference links: 

------------

[1] NHS Survey Coordination Centre (2021) NHS Staff Survey 2021. Available at: NHS Staff Survey 2021 National results briefing (nhsstaffsurveys.com) Accessed 16.05.2022 09.11.

[2] GMC (2013) Good Medical Practice. Available at: Good medical practice-english (gmc-uk.org) Accessed 16.05.2022 09.13.

[3] NMC (2015) The Code; Professional Standards of Practice and Behaviour for Nurses, Midwives and Nursing Associates. Available at: nmc-code.pdf Accessed 16.05.2022 09.16.

[4] Kline R. and Lewis D. (2018) The price of fear: Estimating the financial cost of bullying and harassment to the NHS in England. Public Money and Management. Vol. 39:3, pp. 166-174. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2018.1535044,

[5] Rosenstein A. H. and O’Daniel M. (2008) A survey of the impact of disruptive behaviors and communication defects on patient safety. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. Vol. 34:8, pp. 464-471. DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34058-6

 


Documents


back to top of page